[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Howto solve this in cvs ?
From: |
Gerhard Ahuis |
Subject: |
Re: Howto solve this in cvs ? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Sep 2001 23:40:46 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.19-6.2.1 (i486)) |
Greg A. Woods <address@hidden> wrote:
> [ On Friday, September 28, 2001 at 16:34:19 (+0000), Gerhard Ahuis wrote: ]
>> Subject: Howto solve this in cvs ?
>>
>> The vendor did a complete architecture change and cleanup between 2.x and
>> 3.x.
>> So I created a branch called MySoftBasedOn_2x on which further developments
> you don't really want a branch -- normal branches don't work well in
> vendor branched modules.
What is not working well ? I didn't have any problem until this problem
arrises.
> Your best approach is to start fresh with the 3.x release in a new module.
That is not the way a version control system should work I think. If there
is no way to do it with a vendor like import the only thing left is commiting
the vendor changes as local changes on the MySoftBasedOn_2x branch. That will
work but there is no easy way to distinguish vendor changes and local changes
in that case (and I like the easy merging). There must be a better solution,
cvs has not dissapointed me until now..
Cheers,
Gerhard.
--
Gerhard Ahuis
address@hidden
Unsolicited advertisements subject to $1000 consulting fee.