RE: Possible modifications to CVS.

[Paul Sander]

>--- Forwarded mail from address@hidden

>[ On Tuesday, December 18, 2001 at 13:30:23 (-0600), Thornley, David wrote: ]
>> Subject: RE: Possible modifications to CVS.
>>
>> 
>> So, I figure that that would be a nice capability that isn't
>> going to happen in CVS.

>It is only a "nice" capability if you're trying to deal with a horrid
>mess of files that are poorly organised.

It's also a required feature if you're migrating from one well-organized
structure to another, if you also require keeping the cumulative history
of each file in one easy-to-find place.

>If you organise your files first, and then put them into CVS, such a
>capability is unnecessary and if poorly implemented would even get in
>the way (in any number of possible ways).

If poorly implemented...

>--- End of forwarded message from address@hidden