RE: renames under CVS

[Glew, Andy]

> That would be a very good start.  However it doesn't tell us how the
> picture would change if you'd done ideal, or even just 
> better, planning
> of your modules and file structure before you first checked them into
> CVS.  I don't know how we could independently measure that part.

(0) Basic: the whole point of computers is to reduce the need
for advance planning.  (That's an epiphany I had while talking to
a Prologger a while back.  I'm sure you don't agree.)

(1) For many of my projects, I don't have control over the initial
file structure.  A legacy code base was inherited, imported into CVS,
and then worked on.

I'll get numbers tomorrow, at work.