RE: cvs benchmarks

[Daniels, David F]

Gianni,

Thanks for the info. It helps a lot.

Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: Gianni Mariani [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Daniels, David F
Cc: 'address@hidden'
Subject: Re: cvs benchmarks



To be useful, you need to know how it compares tosomthing else on the 
same hardware.

Another way you could look at this is - how much do you care or what is 
an acceptable level of performance.

Unless you have a monster tree, you're not really going to care because 
"speed" is not a feature you'll care about.

In other words, if you want an answer you're going to get much better 
luck if you describe the kind of performance you care about by 
describing the boundaries of your tree.

I have 1.2 gigs in my cvs repository in 20 different trees, 1900 
directories, 14500 files and overall 54000 commits with users on 
Windows, MacOS X, Solaris and Linux and remote access over slow lines 
and people working on laptops and  travelling around.

            ... Performance has never been an issue.

G

Daniels, David F wrote:

>Anything. Network performance, source tree limits and performance and the
>like. I have some metrics from the CVS Web site, but I was hoping for a bit
>more.
>
>Dave
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gianni Mariani [mailto:address@hidden
>Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:37 AM
>To: Daniels, David F
>Cc: 'address@hidden'
>Subject: Re: cvs benchmarks
>
>
>
>What kind of performance metrics are you looking for ?
>
>or
>
>How big is this source tree you're going to be using ?
>
>G
>
>Daniels, David F wrote:
>
>>Can anyone point me to any benchmarks on CVS's performance?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Dave
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Info-cvs mailing list
>>address@hidden
>>http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
>>
>