[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎó
From: |
Joi Ellis |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 17:48:35 -0500 (CDT) |
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Les Bell wrote:
>
> > Before moderation, how about the simpler step of simply denying all posts
> > by non-members? I can see no legitimate reason why a CVS user would want to
> > post to the list and not receive replies.
>
> Re-read my proposal --- that _was_ my approach <grin>
>
> I have copied RMS (who seems able to get attention <grin>) on
> poll results: 6 in favor, 0 opposed, 5 new pieces of spam at
> the moment.
>
> Will advise.
>
> -- Russ
I'm in favor, too. I just joined this list last week, and it's
the noisest list I've ever seen. I think your proposal is a fine
way to reduce the spam problem.
--
Joi Ellis Software Engineer
Aravox Technologies address@hidden, address@hidden
No matter what we think of Linux versus FreeBSD, etc., the one thing I
really like about Linux is that it has Microsoft worried. Anything
that kicks a monopoly in the pants has got to be good for something.
- Chris Johnson
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Les Bell, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, R P Herrold, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Terry Spafford, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing th e list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåe ÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Thomas S. Urban, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Adam P., 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê,
Joi Ellis <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] eQN, Robert J. Clark, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB23 12] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN· ½Ê, Brian Poynor, 2002/04/08