[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ant and cvs directory structure?
From: |
Joi Ellis |
Subject: |
Re: ant and cvs directory structure? |
Date: |
Mon, 13 May 2002 11:36:52 -0500 (CDT) |
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Ray Tayek wrote:
> hi, new to cvs (used to rcs), trying to grok a rational tree structure for
> cvs. seems like packages hang out in com.foo.packageName... so we have a
> list of these for each project and perhaps a few odds and ends in the
> default package. so it would seem that cvsroot looks like:
>
> cvsroot/
> project1/
> com.foo.product1.bar
> com.foo.prodecut2.baz
> com.tayek.product1...
> ...
> org.quux.product 1...
> project2/...
>
> but this would scatter/duplicate the stuff from com.foo in many places.
I tend to have one JBuilder project <-> one Java package <-> one CVS Module.
However, I also tend to separate unit test classes from application classes
to make deployment easier.
I put reusable utility classes into a utils package, and once I decide I
really want to reuse those classes in other projects, I'll move that class
from its original project over into my Utils project. A physical refactoring,
as it were. It's not uncommon for a Project to have an application package
and a utils package for a time during initial development.
>
> so perhaps the following is indicated:
>
> cvsroot/
> com.foo.product1...
> com.foo.product2...
> org.quux.product1...
> com.tayek.product1...
> ...
> project1...
> package1...
> project2
>
> i figure that you might have test projects for each com.foo.productX and
> that most of the stuff in com.foo.productX be used as a jar in my projects.
> but my own source (the stuff under tayek.com) or stuff that i am hacking
> at probably wants to be copied into each project in many cases. i suppose
> the answer is to have ant get the stuff using a few cvs co's?
I have my Utils project create a utils.jar, and that jar goes onto the class
path of any other project which needs it. I never deliberately duplicate
classes between projects/cvs modules, for that way lies madness. ;) Inside
JBuilder, I typically define a library which points to a
checked-out-and-compiled workspace for the Utils project. That way I don't
have to worry about keeping the jar itself up to date or deal with jar
file handle conflicts.
I use JBuilder rather than ant, but the tool doesn't matter that much.
Ant is a fine, java-based make replacement but I just haven't needed it for
more than building one or two 3rd party libraries.
>
> what do you people usually do?
>
> thanks
>
--
Joi Ellis Software Engineer
Aravox Technologies address@hidden, address@hidden
No matter what we think of Linux versus FreeBSD, etc., the one thing I
really like about Linux is that it has Microsoft worried. Anything
that kicks a monopoly in the pants has got to be good for something.
- Chris Johnson