[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reverting question
From: |
Alex Zoro |
Subject: |
Reverting question |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:38:52 +0100 |
Hi,
I'm new to this mailing list, so I hope this is the right place to ask my
question. I've looked in all the FAQs I can find, but can't find an
explanation of what I'm trying to do. Plus, documentation doesn't match up
with what I try, and the results I get.
Here's the issue:
I work for a video games company, and we use WinCVS to manage the source to
a third party engine. We have the repositry setup with a main / vendor
branch system, and take updates to the main engine around once a month. We
do find, and fix, problems in the engine as we go along, and then send these
back to the third party, who usually incorporate the fixes back into the
vendor code.
If we Modify one of the engine files, then the local branch becomes
designated as the main branch for that file. If the change we have made is
then incorportated into the next vendor release, the two files become
identical (except for the cvs logs). Every time a new version of the engine
is merged, the cvs logs conflict, and the files have to be fixed and
recommitted by hand, even though there are no differences in the code at
all. As time goes by, more files in the repository end up in this state.
We would prefer the logs to be removed from the engine files, and while
others have also expressed this opinion, the third party vendor insists on
keeping them.
It seems that it should be possible in cvs to revert back to the vendor
branch, and so avoid the above merge by hand problem. According to the
wincvs documentation:
START DOCUMENTATION:
Reverting to the latest vendor release
You can also revert local changes completely and return to the latest
vendor release by changing the `head' revision back to the vendor branch on
all files. For example, if you have a checked-out copy of the sources in
~/work.d/wdiff, and you want to revert to the vendor's version for all the
files in that directory, you would type:
$ cd ~/work.d/wdiff
$ cvs admin -bWDIFF .
You must specify the -bWDIFF without any space after the -b. See admin
options.
END DOCUMENTATION.
And also :
START DOCUMENTATION:
admin options
[snip]
-b[rev]
Set the default branch to rev. In CVS, you normally do not manipulate
default branches; sticky tags (see Sticky tags) are a better way to decide
which branch you want to work on. There is one reason to run cvs admin -b:
to revert to the vendor's version when using vendor branches (see Reverting
local changes). There can be no space between -b and its argument.
[snip]
END DOCUMENTATION.
And on the subject of admin users:
START DOCUMENTATION:
admin--Administration
· Requires: repository, working directory.
· Changes: repository.
· Synonym: rcs
This is the CVS interface to assorted administrative facilities. Some of
them have questionable usefulness for CVS but exist for historical
purposes. Some of the questionable options are likely to disappear in the
future. This command does work recursively, so extreme care should be
used.
On unix, if there is a group named cvsadmin, only members of that group can
run cvs admin. This group should exist on the server, or any system
running the non-client/server CVS. To disallow cvs admin for all users,
create a group with no users in it. On NT, the cvsadmin feature does not
exist and all users can run cvs admin.
END DOCUMENTATION.
However, trying to perform the following command "cvs admin -banim.c" (i.e.
we are trying to revert the file anim.c to the vendor version)causes the
following error "cvs [admin aborted]: usage is restricted to repository
administrators"
So, my questions are:
(1) Can anyone explain how to revert a single file back to the vendor
version?
(2) Why do I get the error - documentation seems to indicate I should be
able to perform admin commands (I'm running wincvs 1.3.7.1 on Win2000, and
the server is running cvsnt(don't know version off-hand).
(3) Is the -b option is restricted to a whole branch (or can it be used on
individual files).
(4) Anyone have any suggestions for workarounds?
Thanks,
Alex Zoro
------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Zoro
address@hidden
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
- Reverting question,
Alex Zoro <=