Re: Tag locking change

[Eric Siegerman]

On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:01:36PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Monday, October 7, 2002 at 12:39:29 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> > Anyone who does an rtag without specifying an explicit revision to tag
> > gets exactly what they deserve.
> 
> This part I sort of agree with, though strictly to say such a thing
> you'd have to force them to never tag against the head of a branch with
> rtag.

By default anyway.  Users should probably be allowed to force the
issue.  Too bad "cvs rtag -[fF]" are both taken :-)

--

|  | /\
|-_|/  >   Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.        address@hidden
|  |  /
The acronym for "the powers that be" differs by only one letter
from that for "the pointy-haired boss".