[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tag locking change
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Tag locking change |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:26:08 -0400 (EDT) |
Greg A. Woods writes:
>
> I think the issue is some of us don't want 'cvs rtag' to "work" when the
> intent is to tag the head of a branch, especially not with the new more
> per-directory-only locking scheme
Just to reemphasize, the per-directory locking scheme is not "new", it's
what all versions of CVS prior to 1.11.1 used. The change to locking
the entire tree in CVS 1.11.1 was a stop-gap fix for a serious bug that
could cause data loss.
-Larry Jones
I'm crying because out there he's gone, but he's not gone inside me. -- Calvin
- Re: Tag locking change, (continued)
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Jenn Vesperman, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Jenn Vesperman, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Mike Ayers, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/10
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/10
Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/07
Re: Tag locking change, Patwardhan, Rajesh, 2002/10/07