[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tag locking change
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
Re: Tag locking change |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:04:07 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Wednesday, October 9, 2002 at 11:26:08 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Tag locking change
>
> Greg A. Woods writes:
> >
> > I think the issue is some of us don't want 'cvs rtag' to "work" when the
> > intent is to tag the head of a branch, especially not with the new more
> > per-directory-only locking scheme
>
> Just to reemphasize, the per-directory locking scheme is not "new", it's
> what all versions of CVS prior to 1.11.1 used. The change to locking
> the entire tree in CVS 1.11.1 was a stop-gap fix for a serious bug that
> could cause data loss.
Yes, of course. Sorry about that -- I didn't mean to confuse 1.11.1
with older versions! :-)
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
- Re: Tag locking change, (continued)
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Jenn Vesperman, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Jenn Vesperman, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Mike Ayers, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change,
Greg A. Woods <=
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/10
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/10
Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/07
Re: Tag locking change, Patwardhan, Rajesh, 2002/10/07