[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?
From: |
Zieg, Mark |
Subject: |
RE: Per-modules readers/writers ? |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:25:44 -0400 |
> If not, and I wanted to write a patch to add this feature, what would be
> the best way to do it?
My two bits...move CVSROOT and all its contents into normalized SQL tables.
Not a trivial "patch", but it would open up whole new doors for
manipulating, querying, and accessing the repository (not to mention
transactions and triggers!)
Yes, this would likewise close some doors for those who like direct access
to the raw RCS & metadata files. But anyone conversant in sed or perl
should have little trouble mastering SQL, anyway...
</troll>
-Mark Z
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, (continued)
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Shankar Unni, 2002/10/29
- Re: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Larry Jones, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Shankar Unni, 2002/10/29
- Diffing reformatted code, Eric Siegerman, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Shankar Unni, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/29
- RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?, Paul Sander, 2002/10/29
- Re: Per-modules readers/writers ?, david, 2002/10/29
RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?,
Zieg, Mark <=