RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?

[Shankar Unni]

Larry Jones wrote:

> A bit of both, I suspect.  

That's good to know. 

In any case, I'll take a closer look at the CVSNT stuff (I wish they
hadn't gone and reformatted all their sources so much :-/), and see
what's portable back to the main line..  

Some basic features ("cvs passwd", "cvs ls", etc.) should be easy to
backport. Others (ACLs, all the NT-specific stuff, etc.) may be a lot
more messy, and probably won't be solid enough to pass muster anyway (so
this long argument may be moot, for all you know..)

--
Shankar.