info-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The idea isn't clear...


From: Matthew Herrmann
Subject: Re: The idea isn't clear...
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:12:31 +1000

Eclipse goes one further and gives you an opportunity to synchronise in a
clean area, where you can review changes that come in before they are
automatically merged. This is better than vanilla CVS, though it is a bit
slower to handle over dial-up.

It should be called "synchronize with repository" option (or something
similar).

Essentially, each user does not need to worry about the other until they
commit. The bigger the change, the more likely the last person to commit
will need to resolve conflicts with other users.

-----Original Message-----
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:54:40 -0300
From: "Giovanni Giazzon" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: The idea isn't clear...
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
References:

<address@hidden><000d01c32561$8
address@hidden>
        <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 1

 "you'll get a warning about being not up to date"

That would be great, but I'm working with CVS and Eclipse and that warning
does not seems to exist (it's a plugin to connect to a CVS server). I did
some tests here with one branch being shared between two developers, and
without that "warning" things can get dangerous. But this approach looks
better than the "a branch per developer" one.
Does anybody have experience with CVS and Eclipse in this list?
Thanks,
Giovanni Giazzon







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]