Re: branch info

[Ronald Petty]

I agree, well unless someone tells me that the information is incorrect
then num is good enough for parsing in my book.

Thanks Kaz,
Ron

On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 16:19, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> On 18 Jun 2003, Ronald Petty wrote:
> 
> > But you can tell this information by just looking at num
> > 
> > ex.
> > 
> > 1.2.2.1  (means it branched at 1.2), however if you look at 1.2 it says
> > branch 1.2.2.1 is a branch rooted at itself, which is the exact same
> > information.
> 
> I think that the RCS file format is more flexible than the constraints
> that CVS imposes on it for its own purposes. RCS branching is more
> flexible with the numbering, from what I can recall.
> 
>