[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
From: |
Mark D. Baushke |
Subject: |
Re: Strange diff behavior on branch |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:47:09 -0700 |
Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 <address@hidden> writes:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark D. Baushke
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:49 PM
> > To: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1
> > Cc: 'address@hidden'
> > Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
> >
> >
> > Okay. It appears that the 'feature' of being able to mix tags
> > and dates
> > needs to be resolved and introduced into the trunk version of
> > cvs as it
> > is not yet present in the cvshome.org version of cvs.
> >
>
> Good. Or not. The way it currently is means I can't do
> diffs on a branch based on dates. It is actually not
> dependent on the file being entered on the branch initially.
> I can send an example if you wish.
Yes, I understand.
> And I would expect diff to use the sticky branch tag by
> default. The other cvs commands need an explicit -r HEAD
> to refer to the trunk.
I think that the -D "timestamp" is documented as doing timestamps on the
trunk rather than a branch at present. The "right thing" to do is probably
to either extend the -r syntax to take -r branch:timestamp or add a new
flag like -j branch:timestamp as the FreeBSD folks did.
-- Mark
- Strange diff behavior on branch, Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1, 2003/07/24
- RE: Strange diff behavior on branch, Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1, 2003/07/30
- RE: Strange diff behavior on branch, Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1, 2003/07/31
- RE: Strange diff behavior on branch, Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1, 2003/07/31
- RE: Strange diff behavior on branch, Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1, 2003/07/31
- Re: Strange diff behavior on branch,
Mark D. Baushke <=
- RE: Strange diff behavior on branch, Greg A. Woods, 2003/07/31