Re: Tagging with -D option

[Derek Robert Price]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Larry Jones wrote:

>Jim.Hyslop writes:
>
>>Actually, my installation - 1.11.9 client, 1.11.5 server - refuses to
allow
>>both, complaining that -r and -D are mutually exclusive. This doesn't seem
>>right to me - I tried it using a branch tag, and it still complained; how
>>would I tag all files on a branch, modified before a particular timestamp?
>
>
>Currently, you have to do a checkout/update and then a regular tag.
>I started to update the commands that treat revision and date as
>mutually exclusive, but I stopped because the current method of
>specifying both -r and -D doesn't work for diff and we really want it to
>work the same way for all commands.  Exactly how to do it is an open
>issue.


I like the idea of treating `-r <tag>:<datespec>' like `-j
<tag>:<datespec>'.  Not that I have time to code it just now, but has
anyone come up with objections to that format?

Derek

- --
                *8^)

Email: address@hidden

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAbILKLD1OTBfyMaQRAlPYAJ9kwS5XdcSgSt2KSRXq9Gj8mwjpaACg38DC
peEjtB+MS1wSzCoym/9uWFg=
=teOs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----