Re: How to keep developers separate from committers?

[Todd Denniston]

"Mark D. Baushke" wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jean-Christian Imbeault <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > > From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
> > >
> > > For an example of one of the threads, follow this link:
> > >
> >   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2002-05/msg00149.html
> >
> >
> >   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-01/msg00024.html
> >
> > This looks exactly like the kind of thing that would accomplish what
> > we want to do!
> 
> > Unfortunately the links in these threads for the patches point to a
> > web site that no longer exists :(
> 
> Well, Claus Henriksen probably still reads this list and might post new
> patches for you...
> 
> Of course, the point I was trying to make in that thread was that it is
> POSSIBLE to do the same thing without any of the patches to cvs being
> necessary.
> 
Mark,
would  cvs_acls[1] in the source tarball, or cvs_acls2[2] be more direct
pointers to what he wants, with out having to patch CVS?


[1] cvs-1.11.16/contrib/cvs_acls.in 
[2][sorry only had the tarball from 1.11.16 available so I don't know if
cvs_acls2 has been merged later.]
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-03/msg00401.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=cvs_acls2&idxname=info-cvs&max=20&result=normal&sort=score

-- 
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) 
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter