[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preventing "Dirty" Checkins
From: |
Maarten de Boer |
Subject: |
Re: Preventing "Dirty" Checkins |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:04:05 +0200 |
> But that's a different approach from what was suggested. The suggested
> approach was a commitinfo script. Commitinfo runs *only* on the server.
>
> I'm not saying the suggested approach was the best, or even workable. I'm
> just pointing out a potential problem with the suggestion.
Yes, yes, I know, I suggested the different approach (a dedicated test
machine) in a previous mail, and saw this as another argument in favor.
I should have been more clear.
Maarten
- Re: Preventing "Dirty" Checkins, (continued)
- Re: Preventing "Dirty" Checkins, Pierre Asselin, 2004/09/28
- Re: Preventing "Dirty" Checkins, Greg A. Woods, 2004/09/29
- RE: Preventing "Dirty" Checkins, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/09/29
- RE: Preventing "Dirty" Checkins, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/09/29
- RE: Preventing "Dirty" Checkins, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/09/29
- RE: Preventing "Dirty" Checkins, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/09/29