[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Annotate of Log output wrong
From: |
Hugh Gibson |
Subject: |
RE: Annotate of Log output wrong |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:19 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
> OTOH, it might be OK to modify the behaviour of the 'annotate' command
> to mimic the expansion behaviour of the checkout/update command. If
> someone were inclined to write such a patch ;=)
That sounds the reasonable path. However, it doesn't explain why the
output of the log command is annotated incorrectly, but the code changes
are annotated correctly.
Sounds like I'm on a losing wicket here - a deprecated keyword
substitution combined with a little-used command. I wonder if Subversion
works in these circumstances? ;-)
Hugh
- Annotate of Log output wrong, Hugh Gibson, 2004/12/07
- RE: Annotate of Log output wrong, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/12/07
- RE: Annotate of Log output wrong,
Hugh Gibson <=
- Re: Annotate of Log output wrong, Todd Denniston, 2004/12/07
- Re: Annotate of Log output wrong, Hugh Gibson, 2004/12/08
- Re: Annotate of Log output wrong, Todd Denniston, 2004/12/08
- Re: Annotate of Log output wrong, Hugh Gibson, 2004/12/08
- Re: Annotate of Log output wrong, Todd Denniston, 2004/12/08
- Re: Annotate of Log output wrong, Hugh Gibson, 2004/12/09
- Uniform resource locator for cvs data?, jpb, 2004/12/07