info-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which combination of CVS-Tools can be recommended in a (Windows-Linu


From: Pierre Asselin
Subject: Re: Which combination of CVS-Tools can be recommended in a (Windows-Linux) Client-Server environment?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 02:39:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: tin/1.6.1-20030810 ("Mingulay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/2.0 (i386))

Christian <address@hidden> wrote:

> I'm currently installing a linux-server with red-hat 9. There are
> a few clients that run on Windows XP or Windows 2000.  Now I have
> to make thoughts which CVS- tool to take, because it is planned to
> use CVS for source control.  Has someone made experience in such
> a client-server environment?

Yes.  Server:  stock CVS on Redhat 7.2, access through ssh with
public key authentication.  I create user accounts as needed and
copy public keys to the ~/.ssh/authorized_keys files.  Oh, and I
installed viewcvs under apache because some users find it useful.

Linux clients:  stock CVS and ssh.  Windows clients: TortoiseCVS,
with PuTTY for the ssh access.

> Can someone recommend a combination that runs stable.  Currently
> I would tend to install cvs-1.11.18-cvshome.org.9x.1.i386.rpm but
> I would appreciate very much if someone could give me a hint which
> versions/tools to take.

Like I said, I just used the stock binaries that came with my
boxes.  This is not a big team and software development is not our
primary function by a long shot, so we're not exactly stress-testing
the setup.  The RH 7.2 dates from my starting day.  I know it looks
old now, but it still works fine.

This is on an intranet, so I don't have to be too paranoid
about security.  The apache is probably the biggest hole !

At my previous job we had a Linux server and various clients with
a small but very active team (as in: update three times a day or
you'll be left behind).  As far as I know the server was whatever
Redhat release was current at the time and the CVS was the stock
install.  Worked fine.

-- 
pa at panix dot com


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]