[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Again: multiple vendors
From: |
Baurzhan Ismagulov |
Subject: |
Re: Again: multiple vendors |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:47:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:38:09AM -0500, Larry Jones wrote:
> Baurzhan Ismagulov writes:
> >
> > 1. Added and deleted files: I have to track them manually when I apply
> > the delta for a new upstream release. I have to grep for 1970 and add
> > / remove the files.
>
> That shouldn't be necessary -- a normal merge using two revision tags
> should note and process added and deleted files correctly.
Yes, if you have the vendor's latest release in CVS already. I've meant
the step of putting that last release into the repository without using
import command, like this:
cvs co -rbsp102 linux
cd linux
patch -p1 <../bsp102-106.diff
<some files added, some files removed>
Now I have to cvs add and cvs rm those files.
With kind regards,
Baurzhan.
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, (continued)
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Greg A. Woods, 2005/03/03
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/03/03
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Greg A. Woods, 2005/03/03
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/03/06
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Kaz Kylheku, 2005/03/07
- Message not available
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Pierre Asselin, 2005/03/03
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/03/06
- Message not available
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Pierre Asselin, 2005/03/06
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/03/20
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Larry Jones, 2005/03/04
- Re: Again: multiple vendors,
Baurzhan Ismagulov <=
- Message not available
- Re: Again: multiple vendors, Pierre Asselin, 2005/03/03
Re: Long version numbers | Tedious to keep track, Xapp, 2005/03/02