[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subversion vs CVS
From: |
Dale |
Subject: |
Re: Subversion vs CVS |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:53:56 GMT |
"Jim Hyslop" <address@hidden> wrote in message
news:address@hidden
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dale wrote:
> > Does this mean I can't have nonrepository files in my working directory?
> > When you commit in CVS it ignores files which are not in the repository,
so
> > you can have experimental files or helper files which are never
committed
> > but which coexist with the cvs files. Is the behavior not the same for
> > subversion?
>
> I could be wrong, but I strongly suspect you will find that asking
> questions about SubVersion will get more prompt, and more informed,
> answers on a SubVersion mail list.
I considered that, but sadly, my news service has no subversion or svn
newsgroup. Thanks for your helpful tip.