[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subversion vs CVS
From: |
Mark D. Baushke |
Subject: |
Re: Subversion vs CVS |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:13:00 -0800 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dale <address@hidden> writes:
> "Jim Hyslop" <address@hidden> wrote
> > Dale wrote:
> > > Does this mean I can't have nonrepository
> > > files in my working directory? When you
> > > commit in CVS it ignores files which are not
> > > in the repository, so you can have
> > > experimental files or helper files which are
> > > never committed but which coexist with the
> > > cvs files. Is the behavior not the same for
> > > subversion?
> >
> > I could be wrong, but I strongly suspect you
> > will find that asking questions about
> > SubVersion will get more prompt, and more
> > informed, answers on a SubVersion mail list.
>
> I considered that, but sadly, my news service
> has no subversion or svn newsgroup. Thanks for
> your helpful tip.
You are making your life more difficult than is needed.
Use e-mail... ask the mailing list: address@hidden
Look on the web for tips:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/19/subversiontips.html
Post e-mail via google groups:
http://groups.google.com/group/Subversion-SVN?lnk=srg&hl=en
Good luck,
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFDyLKMCg7APGsDnFERAjVxAKCnU2jIT0O2VhNlzGLehp8kRqC+YQCeKUJK
D2vwM9FctYGSng9S2eFeVAE=
=jeM2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----