[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Branches without a magic branch number
From: |
Jon Smirl |
Subject: |
Branches without a magic branch number |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jun 2006 10:11:16 -0400 |
When working on the giant (3GB) Mozilla CVS repository I am
encountering thousand of branches that don't have a magic branch
label. Why is the magic branch number missing?
For example, there should a branch label 1.36.2 but there is none.
1.36.2 obviously exists since 1.36.2.2.2 was branched from it.
address@hidden mozilla]$ cvs stat -v Makefile.in | grep 36
SeaMonkey_M8_BRANCH (branch: 1.36.4)
SeaMonkey_M8_BASE (revision: 1.36)
AUTOCONF_NSPR_WIN32_XCOMPILE_19990621_BRANCH (branch: 1.36.2.2.2)
From the ,v file. You can see that 1.36.2.1 has been created but there
is no 1.36.0.2 magic branch tag. Everything is fine with the 1.34.4
branch. The BASE tag for 1.36.2.2.2 is also missing on 1.36.2.
SeaMonkey_M8_BRANCH:1.36.0.4
SeaMonkey_M8_BASE:1.36
AUTOCONF_NSPR_WIN32_XCOMPILE_19990621_BRANCH:1.36.2.2.0.2
1.36
date 99.06.21.00.26.16; author mcafee%netscape.com; state Exp;
branches
1.36.2.1;
next 1.35;
1.36.2.1
date 99.07.23.16.08.19; author cls%seawood.org; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.36.2.2;
1.36.2.2
date 99.08.15.20.58.40; author cls%seawood.org; state Exp;
branches
1.36.2.2.2.1;
next ;
1.36.2.2.2.1
date 99.08.20.15.59.59; author cls%seawood.org; state Exp;
branches;
--
1.36
log
@Better ifdef logic for NECKO.
--
1.36.2.1
log
@Added cross-compiling support variables.
--
1.36.2.2
log
@More changes for cross-compiling support.
--
1.36.2.2.2.1
log
@Merged with HEAD from 8/18 or so.
--
Jon Smirl
address@hidden
- Branches without a magic branch number,
Jon Smirl <=
- RE: Branches without a magic branch number, Rick Genter, 2006/06/17
- Re: Branches without a magic branch number, Jon Smirl, 2006/06/17
- RE: Branches without a magic branch number, Rick Genter, 2006/06/17
- Re: Branches without a magic branch number, Jon Smirl, 2006/06/17
- RE: Branches without a magic branch number, Rick Genter, 2006/06/17
- Re: Branches without a magic branch number, Jon Smirl, 2006/06/17
- Re: Branches without a magic branch number, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/18
- Re: Branches without a magic branch number, Jon Smirl, 2006/06/17