Re: cvs update new directories

[yh]

Thanks Spiro. I've tried to use "cvs -f update", but still noting was
updated, no did the CVS Entries in another machine. Then, I started to
create a new copy by "cvs co module", it got all new directoris, the only
thing I could not undstand was there were to Entries, one is Entries and
another is a new Entries.Log in the CVS directory (which I don't have the
Entries.Log in my copy). Why the CVS server created another Entries.Log?
Could this be a problem where other machine does not have Entries.Log
(only Entries)? I've little bit lost by this situation.

Thank you.

Jim

> Hello Jim,
>
> * On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:46:19PM +1100 Jim wrote:
>
>> I added and committed a new directory to the CVS tree from my local work
>> copy. I can see the new added directory in CVS Entries of my local copy
>> and I can see the new added directory in CVS server. But when I did a
>> "cvs update" from another machine, the new added directory did not come,
>> noting was updated. What is this problem and now can I fix it?
>
> most probably, the -P option is used on that second machine. Make sure
> it is not used (by issuing "cvs -f update ...").
>
> Best regards,
>    Spiro.
>
> --
> Spiro R. Trikaliotis                              http://opencbm.sf.net/
> http://www.trikaliotis.net/                     http://www.viceteam.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> info-cvs mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
>