RE: Large file actual performance report; cvs use of ,v header issometimes non-optimal.

[Arthur Barrett]

Todd,

> 'is 1.25 still the head/does it still exist?' on commit 
> before working on 
> anything else, because it always checks to see if you need to 
> do an update 
> before commit.  Is this already the case in newer CVS's?
> And before someone says 'but he messed up the repo', which I 
> agree... it 
> should be trivial while checking 'if [current repo HEAD rev > 
> current Entries 
> rev]' also check 'if [current repo HEAD rev < current Entries 
> rev]; {throw 
> error/check to see if Entries rev still exists}'... at least 
> for someone who 
> knows where the first test is taking place now in the code.
> [Arthur, if you look this up in CVSNT, please drop a note to 
> what file it is 
> in for CVSNT, and the 10 lines around it... If I have to make 
> a patch that 
> would maybe help me find it in CVS.]

I try very hard to avoid looking in rcs.cpp since it tends to give me a
headache ;)

Regards,


Arthur