[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVSNT versus CVS
From: |
Vinod Damaraju |
Subject: |
Re: CVSNT versus CVS |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:40:37 -0400 |
Larry,
Thank you for your reply. I do not have control over the CVS version on the
Linux server i.e., cannot upgrade it nor replace it with CVSNT. If I use the
remote CVS server, a signifcant functionality of the conversion tool would
not work. I am looking for specific answers about the changes in repository
file formats between CVSNT and CVS 1.11.xx so that I can account for those
changes in my process ..
Thanks,
Vinod Damaraju
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Jones" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: CVSNT versus CVS
address@hidden writes:
CVS server was on Linux and was CVS 1.11.2.
That is *ancient* -- the current stable release is 1.11.22! I strongly
suggest you update.
I used CVSNT as my local CVS server.
Big mistake. As you've discovered, CVSNT repositories are *not*
compatible with regular CVS repositories. You either need to redo the
conversion using a regular CVS server (you could use your Linux server
rather than a local server) or you need to use CVSNT on Linux.
--
Larry Jones
But Mom, frogs are our FRIENDS! -- Calvin