[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64
From: |
Albert Chin-A-Young |
Subject: |
Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64 |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 17:22:51 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.1.12i |
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:09:48PM -0600, Tim Mooney wrote:
> In regard to: Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Albert...:
>
> >Not all systems allow you to embed RPATH in a library. Tru64 UNIX 4.0D
> >is one. I think libtool 1.4 and above allow you to embed RPATH.
>
> Unless I misunderstand you, that's not correct:
>
> 05:04pm obelisk lib$odump -D /local/lib/libz.so | egrep 'RPATH'
> RPATH: /local/lib
> 05:05pm obelisk lib$sizer -v
> Digital UNIX V4.0D (Rev. 878); Mon Mar 13 16:49:14 CST 2000
>
> I've been doing this successfully for a long time.
>
> What *is* true, in the context of the original topic, is that at least
> through 5.0 the RPATH in a shared library is not used to find shared
> libraries that are explictly dlopened by a program. I had a Compaq
> loader engineer explain it to me one time, it's somewhat complex.
Ok, that's what I meant. Thanks for the clarification.
> They expect to change that behavior in the future, from what he said.
Great!
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Albert Chin-A-Young, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Albert Chin-A-Young, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Bjoern Fischer, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Bjoern Fischer, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/12/21