[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS
From: |
libtool |
Subject: |
Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:44:35 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 10:10:49AM -0500, Robert Boehne wrote:
> "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
> >
> > On Monday 16 July 2001 4:10 pm, Robert Boehne wrote:
> > > Here is the test case, if someone wants to libtoolize it, we
> > > could add it to the macro.
> >
> > Seconded! I would happily accept a patch to perform the test *instead* of
> > listing values for only hosts triplets that have been researched...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gary.
>
> If we use the test *instead* of looking at the host we would miss the
> case for Tru64 4-5.1, which passes the test but doesn't search the
> library RPATH, but perhaps we could limit it to that case only.
Then how about augmenting the patch to catch this case? This is
actually important for people how have Tru64 UNIX with patch kit < #2
where such an augmented test would fail and patch kit >= #2 where the
augmented test should succeed.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, (continued)
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/07/12
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/13
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/13
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/13
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS,
libtool <=
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16