[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ltdl/mdemo test
From: |
Patrick Welche |
Subject: |
Re: ltdl/mdemo test |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:26:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.19i |
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
...
> HAVE_LIBDL is a misnomer, and should perhaps be renamed to
> HAVE_DLOPEN, since the additon of a library that contains dlopen is
> handled separately.
Good idea :)
Patrick
- ltdl/mdemo test, Patrick Welche, 2001/09/10
- Re: ltdl/mdemo test, Nick Hudson, 2001/09/10
- Re: ltdl/mdemo test, Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/11
- Re: ltdl/mdemo test, Patrick Welche, 2001/09/12
- Re: ltdl/mdemo test, Patrick Welche, 2001/09/12
- Re: ltdl/mdemo test, Nick Hudson, 2001/09/12
- Re: ltdl/mdemo test, Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/13
- Re: ltdl/mdemo test, Nick Hudson, 2001/09/14
- Re: ltdl/mdemo test,
Patrick Welche <=
- Re: ltdl/mdemo test, Patrick Welche, 2001/09/12