Re: ltdl.c thinks it's psychic (another SEGFAULT bug).

[libtool]

On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:32:46PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> >Because ltdl.h already states that libltdl relies on a featureful
> >realloc, let's just set lt_dlrealloc = realloc and test for a
> >featureful realloc in ltdl.m4. Let's recommend that if anyone changes
> >at least one of lt_dlmalloc, lt_dlrealloc, or lt_dlfree, then they
> >should also change them all. Let the client worry about malloc/free
> >and ltdl be somewhat stupid to the choices of the client.
> 
> what is any of this for in the first place?

You mean why do we allos someone to define lt_dlmalloc, lt_dlrealloc,
and lt_dlfree? I don't know :)

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)