[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool, Apache 2.0, AIX
From: |
Jeff Trawick |
Subject: |
Re: libtool, Apache 2.0, AIX |
Date: |
30 Nov 2001 18:25:44 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Robert Boehne <address@hidden> writes:
> In Libtool we allow for either to be built, the latter being
> created when -Wl,-brtl is added to LDFLAGS during configure.
>From my perspective, I only get to choose we whether or not I do
run-time linking... I don't get to choose what format shared
object/library I get. And these are orthogonal issues.
Since run-time linking is a set of behaviors that affects how the
applications and libraries interact and no mere file storage/naming
issue, it is clear that to run-time link or not to run-time link is
the choice really being made. That's why I shudder when I am told
that the way to get libtool to use pure libfoo.so on AIX is to simply
add "-Wl,-brtl". It hides the fact that apps can start working
differently.
But I admit that I need to read all available doc on run-time linking
and then go re-do the conversations I've had in the past with me
better able to ask why run-time linking isn't the right thing.
--
Jeff Trawick | address@hidden | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
- libtool, Apache 2.0, AIX, Jeff Trawick, 2001/11/30
- Re: libtool, Apache 2.0, AIX, Marc Stephenson, 2001/11/30
- Re: libtool, Apache 2.0, AIX, Jeff Trawick, 2001/11/30
- Re: libtool, Apache 2.0, AIX, Robert Boehne, 2001/11/30
- Re: libtool, Apache 2.0, AIX, Jeff Trawick, 2001/11/30
- Re: libtool, Apache 2.0, AIX,
Jeff Trawick <=