Re: libtool and gcc -m*

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Albert Chin wrote:
> > > How about libtool passing through *any* option it doesn't recognize.
> > > Actually, I thought it already did this but I guess I'm wrong.
> >
> > It wouldn't have done this in the past because it used to invoke the
> > linker directly.  Now it links via the compiler so it could pass
> > options through to the link stage.
>
> So can you change your patch to do this? That way we're not
> susceptible to similar problems in the future.

The implementation would be a bit different than what I have right
now, but it seems simple enough to do.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen