[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libtool 1.4.3
From: |
Earnie Boyd |
Subject: |
Re: Libtool 1.4.3 |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Oct 2002 07:48:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 |
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>Wouldn't it be better to get libtool 1.5 out the door? The resources
>>required to achieve a releasable product are similar and CVS libtool
>>already contains most of the fixes that would go into a 1.4.3.
>
>
> But it also contains more features. Releasing 1.5 should be done by
> the maintainers, not by a "community" process; instead I think that
> such a process is perfectly valid to review patches and ChangeLogs and
> put them together.
>
The community are the maintainers, therefore a maintainer has spoken for
a minor version increment, rather than a patch release increment.
Enough has changed to increment the minor version number.
> Yes, libtool would-be-1.5 has been used by gcc at least since 3.0, so it
> should be pretty good, but I think that it is easier (in terms of
> brainwork, not of needed resources) to do a "definitive" 1.4.x release.
>
Since I'm one of the community, I suggest the release to be 1.5 and that
Akim's suggestion for AC_PREREQ a strong point. Perhaps, both a 1.4.3
and a 1.5 where 1.4.3 does a AC_PREREQ 2.13.
Earnie.
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, (continued)
Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Guido Draheim, 2002/10/08
Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Albert Chin, 2002/10/08
Message not available
Re: Libtool 1.4.3,
Earnie Boyd <=