[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 1.5 alpha release?
From: |
ross . alexander |
Subject: |
RE: 1.5 alpha release? |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 11:14:39 +0000 |
Robert,
I now have company copyright assignment signed but I haven't
got around to sending it off, but I could fax it to FSF today. Is
the patch still held up by the copyright assignment or the problems
with the library dependencies?
Cheers,
Ross
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross Alexander "We demand clearly defined
MIS - NEC Europe Limited boundaries of uncertainty and
Work ph: +44 20 8752 3394 doubt."
|---------+---------------------------------------------------->
| | "Boehne, Robert" |
| | <address@hidden> |
| | Sent by: |
| | libtool-bounces+ross.alexander=uk.neceur.|
| | address@hidden |
| | |
| | |
| | 02/01/2003 15:59 |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: "'address@hidden'" <address@hidden>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: RE: 1.5 alpha release?
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Albert,
There are still issues with Mac OS X, and the patch for hppa64 from Ross.
The problem with OS X is that $shrext is evaluated too soon, and I can't
figure out how to quote it so it won't. I may end up having to add
a second variable $modext and going back to a method like was used before
$shrext was introduced. I hate to do that because it isn't necessary
on any other platform. We're also waiting on a copyright assignment for
the piecewise archive linking patch.
Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Chin [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 11:22 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: 1.5 alpha release?
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 02:41:07PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Your requests are certainly being heard. I would like to see a
> libtool 1.5 released soon as well, since CVS libtool is better than
> the last release, and a 1.5.1 release can fix any flaws discovered in
> 1.5.
>
> Since the last tentative "We'll release in a couple of weeks" (which
> was probably 2 months ago) quite a few platform-related fixes have
> gone into CVS libtool.
What's left to do before 1.5 can be released?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool