Re: ANSIfy GCC

[Bruce Korb]

FYA:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg00594.html

This is the mail archive of the address@hidden mailing list for the GCC project.

---

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c

• From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
• To: Mike Stump <mstump at apple dot com>
• Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>,Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
• Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:31:13 +0000
• Subject: Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c
• References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden>

---

Mike Stump wrote:-

> Sun dropped /bin/cc, and we managed.  10 years to take up a new 
> standard seems like plenty enough time, I say we announce that in 3.4 
> we mandate a C89+ compiler, and just do it.  This will cause far fewer 
> problems, and those problems will be trivial to work around, when 
> compared to the new C++ parser, which we've already done.

Hear hear.

Neil.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c
    • From: Phil Edwards

• References:
  • Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c
    • From: Zack Weinberg
  • Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c
    • From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]