libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC


From: Robert Boehne
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:53:50 -0600

Albert,

The intent here is to satisfy those who want -DPIC but remove all
macro definition by default.  I agree with the suggestion earlier
in this thread of adding a new macro AC_LIBTOOL_PICDEF([PIC])
and we'll plan on this for the release after the next one.

Thanks,

Robert

Albert Chin wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:13:54AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> > Robert Boehne <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > All good ideas, and I don't really have a preference for any of them.
> > > If you do, let me know or I'll just pick the one that looks easiest.
> >
> > I'd think an autoconf macro would be ok, to be used for instance
> >
> >       AC_LIBTOOL_PICDEF([-DPIC])
> >       AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
> >
> > which I guess would just insert its argument into $pic_flag.
> 
> Is setting a custom -DPIC really necessary? How about we just leave
> the existing -DPIC for the C and C++ tags? I don't see anything to
> gain by choosing a new default or allowing it to be set.
> 
> --
> albert chin (address@hidden)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]