[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flat namespaces redux
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: |
Re: flat namespaces redux |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:52:42 +0900 |
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 01:27 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
This would make libtool default to making twolevel libraries (which
is darwin's linker default, in fact), but you could still pass
"-flat_namespace -undefined suppress" to the command-line if you have
a poorly behaving app.
Well, I think that building thing two level namespace ought to be the
libtool default also, flat_namespace is needed for some things but
causes problems for many others, how about trying both by default?
cc -multiply_defined suppress -prebind blah || cc -flat_namespace
-undefined suppress blah
Peter
- flat namespaces redux, Benjamin Reed, 2003/02/02
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Benjamin Reed, 2003/02/02
- Re: flat namespaces redux,
Peter O'Gorman <=
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Benjamin Reed, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Peter O'Gorman, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Albert Chin, 2003/02/03
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Robert Boehne, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Yves de Champlain, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Albert Chin, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Robert Boehne, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Albert Chin, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Robert Boehne, 2003/02/04
- Re: flat namespaces redux, Benjamin Reed, 2003/02/06