Re: flat namespaces redux

[Albert Chin]

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:56:47PM -0600, Robert Boehne wrote:
> [snip snip]
>
> For this feature to really be useful a library would have to be
>   a) Initially developed on OS/X
>   b) dependent on two level namespace
>   c) not really useful on any other plaform (no reason to
>      fix for a flat namespace)
> I don't think there are too many libraries that would fit this
> criteria, but please, correct me if I'm wrong.
> 
> In short, I'm not dead set against the idea, I just don't see the point.

I have no clue when it comes to OSX. However, the only reason I
support this is the impression I get that two-level namespaces are
good for OSX. Is this true? Does Apple *recommend* flat or two-level
namespaces?

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)