Re: Cyclic dependencies

[Earnie Boyd]

Thomas Maier wrote:
> Sigh.  It's not a perfect world.  Quoting myself: "I guess as a
> linux-only user I am kind of ignorant or, well, at least a newbie to
> portability things."  After having spent days reading about that stuff I
> already suspected linux does things in a rather modern way.  But I
> didn't know it can be *that* bad.  Might you be so kind and give me a
> short hint if linux's behaviour is really extraordinary or if systems
> with such limited library features are slowly dying away?

Hardly dieing.  Win32 for example requires dependent libraries to follow 
the objects that depend on them.

Earnie.