Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.2 released

[Scott James Remnant]

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 01:35, Daniel Reed wrote:

> On 2004-01-28T15:59-0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> ) On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:15, Daniel Reed wrote:
> ) > Since there does not appear to be any C++ code (.cc, .cxx, .C) in libtool,
> ) > would it be possible for the next release of libtool to not:
> ) There isn't any C code either ... it checks for various compilers so it
> ) can provide support for them (ie. you can go "libtool g++").
> 
> The problem I was reporting is not so much the testing for C++ as it was the
> failing of ./configure if a C++ preprocessor was not available. There is C
> code in the various examples directories, so failing for lack of a C
> compiler might at least be reasonable.
> 
That's actually an Autoconf macro that's failing, unfortunately.  It's
an irritant, but I've not figured out a way of getting around it short
of overriding AC_MSG_ERROR.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part