Re: no serial number?

[Scott James Remnant]

On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 16:48, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

> Patrick Welche wrote:
> | libtool.m4 contains:
> |
> | # serial 49 AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
> | AC_DEFUN_ONCE([LT_INIT],
> | AU_DEFUN([AC_PROG_LIBTOOL],         [LT_INIT])
> | AU_DEFUN([AM_PROG_LIBTOOL],         [LT_INIT])
> |
> |>From the above, libtoolize won't include libtool.m4, because it is looking
> | for AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_LIBTOOL])
> |
> | It seems one can either change libtool.m4's serial line to LT_INIT and
> | change libtoolize to look for LT_INIT, or one can change libtoolize to
> | look for A[CU]_DEFUN [macro_name].
> |
> | Thoughts?
> 
> Exactly right.  I have a half cocked patch to fix this that needs testing
> before I commit...
> 
Did this patch get lost in the battle of BT vs. THE PLIERS? :-)

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part