[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about libtool's trace interface for tags
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: about libtool's trace interface for tags |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 04:26:27 +0100 |
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 22:39, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Is it done or is there any obstacle to it? I'm dreaming about
> Automake 1.9, and if possible I would like to include support
> for this.
>
The current interface should be pretty good, trace for invocations of
_LT_TAG and the first argument will be a tag name that maps equally to a
language name (CC, CXX, F77, etc.)
I tried to make sure it was easy and everything that invented a tag went
through the same mechanism.
Even if things change, I'll make sure that _LT_TAG remains the trace
point.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- about libtool's trace interface for tags, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/04/13
- Re: about libtool's trace interface for tags,
Scott James Remnant <=
- Re: about libtool's trace interface for tags, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/04/14
- Re: about libtool's trace interface for tags, Scott James Remnant, 2004/04/14
- Re: about libtool's trace interface for tags, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/04/14
- Re: about libtool's trace interface for tags, Scott James Remnant, 2004/04/14
- Re: about libtool's trace interface for tags, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/04/17
- Re: about libtool's trace interface for tags (gah, went to wrong list), Scott James Remnant, 2004/04/17