[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linking against indirect dependencies
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: Linking against indirect dependencies |
Date: |
29 May 2004 07:41:35 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
On May 28, 2004, Szombathelyi György <address@hidden> wrote:
> AFAIK it's possible to link in libdep to libfoo if libdep is static
Depends on the platform. Some combinations of OSs, ABIs and hardware
architectures don't allow non-PIC in shared libraries. Yes, several
of the platforms that don't support this are GNU/Linux ports.
Try this on x86_64-linux-gnu, for example. It won't work, unless you
somehow arrange for libdep.o to not contain any relocations that
aren't PIC.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer address@hidden, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist address@hidden, gnu.org}
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, (continued)
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Szombathelyi György, 2004/05/25
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Albert Chin, 2004/05/25
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Szombathelyi György, 2004/05/26
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/05/26
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Alexandre Oliva, 2004/05/29
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Szombathelyi György, 2004/05/29
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- RE: Linking against indirect dependencies, Howard Chu, 2004/05/29
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Szombathelyi György, 2004/05/31
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Scott James Remnant, 2004/05/26
- Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Szombathelyi György, 2004/05/27
Re: Linking against indirect dependencies, Szombathelyi György, 2004/05/26