[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libltdl & Automake improvements
From: |
Gary V . Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: libltdl & Automake improvements |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Sep 2004 00:25:29 +0100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 8 Sep 2004, at 00:05, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It seems a shame that non-recursive packages must become recursive in
order to build libltdl. Using Automake includes, Automake
conditionals, and well-defined conventions, libltdl's Makefile.am
could simply be included into the package's own Makefile.am. This
would allow libltdl targets to be built without any additional
recursion, and without creating another Makefile.in.
Thoughts?
What about projects that want to use libltdl, but not automake? We
shouldn't
force the parent project to use particular tools. As long as we
continue to support non-automake parent projects, then: +1 from me.
I expect that just means making sure libltdl/configure.ac can build
libltdl.la
as a subproject, so it shouldn't be a problem.
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBPkNrFRMICSmD1gYRAtrjAKCbH5ZqKveqiAmrMnxQJjjKfMaBkgCeNVfe
0lnvFdfB5bblShWql2NVt0o=
=5umy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----