[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compile problem
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: compile problem |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Sep 2004 07:28:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
Gary> So does that simply mean that libtool objects can be correctly built
Gary> as subdir-objects without AM_PROG_CC_C_O? Sorry to bug you, just
Gary> making sure I understand why you made the patch the way you did...
The purpose of AM_PROG_CC_C_O is to replace CC by the `compile'
script which emulates a compiler that supports `-c -o' when the
real CC does not. As you pointed out, libtool already supplies such
emulation, so `compile' is never needed when compiling lo files.
[...]
Gary> Meant to ask, why doesn't AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE (conditionally if
Gary> necessary) simply invoke AM_PROG_CC_C_O?
We know it's needed only after processing the Makefile.am files.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: compile problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/09/07
- Re: compile problem, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/09/07
- Re: compile problem,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=
- Re: compile problem, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/10
- Re: compile problem, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/10
- Re: compile problem, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/10
- Re: compile problem, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/10
- Re: compile problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/09/20
- Re: compile problem, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/21
- Re: compile problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/09/20
- Re: compile problem, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/09/20
- Re: compile problem, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/21
Re: compile problem, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/09/08