[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
hardcode_direct et. al.
From: |
Gary V . Vaughan |
Subject: |
hardcode_direct et. al. |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Sep 2004 02:26:42 +0100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Libtoolers,
I see that we have developed a test failure in demo-hardcode.test on
linux, which seems to be down to the hardcoded value from libtool.m4
disagreeing with the probed value from demos-hardcode.test.
It seems to me that we should be probing from *libtool.m4*, not
guessing and then testing! It also gives us one less thing to maintain
in each libtool port.
Does anyone know of a reason why we can't remove demo-hardcode.test
altogether and move the probes into libtool.m4?
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBQlRVFRMICSmD1gYRAjbDAKC0J570xMh41or7V0PRNxELMDxOQACgn1li
SlHmoG/BAgPf+o83NuWmqnA=
=SVQU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- hardcode_direct et. al.,
Gary V . Vaughan <=