libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

hardcode_direct et. al.


From: Gary V . Vaughan
Subject: hardcode_direct et. al.
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 02:26:42 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Libtoolers,

I see that we have developed a test failure in demo-hardcode.test on
linux, which seems to be down to the hardcoded value from libtool.m4
disagreeing with the probed value from demos-hardcode.test.

It seems to me that we should be probing from *libtool.m4*, not guessing and then testing! It also gives us one less thing to maintain in each libtool port.

Does anyone know of a reason why we can't remove demo-hardcode.test altogether and move the probes into libtool.m4?

Cheers,
        Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBQlRVFRMICSmD1gYRAjbDAKC0J570xMh41or7V0PRNxELMDxOQACgn1li
SlHmoG/BAgPf+o83NuWmqnA=
=SVQU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]