libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TODO


From: Gary V. Vaughan
Subject: Re: TODO
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:14:32 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Macintosh/20041103)

Hi Howard!

Howard Chu wrote:

That's great for shared libraries, but one of the things I actually like about libtool is the automatic dependency inclusion when linking static libraries. I.e., plain 'ol .a archives are much less friendlier without libtool because they don't carry any dependency info...

Agreed.  We would only drop the deplibs when we know the linker will
handle it.  The only difference to the user is that they will see much
shorter linker calls if they are building on a host that can handle it.
Everything is remains as is!

Cheers,
        Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]