Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Hi Ralf,

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:20:01PM CET:
> 
>>>>>"Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> Bob> What I have now learned the hard way is that aclocal ignores the
>> Bob> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) definition in configure.ac.
>>
>>IMHO it's a bug in whatever let you think aclocal would honor
>>AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR to way you thought.  It certainly isn't the
>>Automake manual.
>>
>>See also
>>  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-11/msg00097.html
> 
> 
> Gary, can we revert libtool--release--2.0--patch-67 or fix it?
> This is a major pain for people when testing branch-2-0.

The automake-1.4 compatibility patch?  Why, what is wrong with it?

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature