Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 03:19:13PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:20:01PM CET:
> >>>>>"Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> Bob> What I have now learned the hard way is that aclocal ignores the
> >> Bob> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) definition in configure.ac.
> >>
> >>IMHO it's a bug in whatever let you think aclocal would honor
> >>AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR to way you thought.  It certainly isn't the
> >>Automake manual.
> >>
> >>See also
> >>  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-11/msg00097.html
> > 
> > 
> > Gary, can we revert libtool--release--2.0--patch-67 or fix it?
> > This is a major pain for people when testing branch-2-0.
> 
> The automake-1.4 compatibility patch?  Why, what is wrong with it?

Brother.  I meant libtool--release--2.0--patch-68.
Where's the coffee?

Sorry for the noise,
Ralf